Main image

REUTERS Live News

Watch live streaming video from ilicco at livestream.com

Monday, March 14, 2011

EDTORIAL : rfI english, FRANCE


French press review 14 March 2011
By Marjorie Hache

Every French daily is inevitably giving centre stage to the series of natural disasters that occurred in Japan featuring in depth coverage of the earthquake and tsunami. This series of events has been dubbed Japan's worst crisis since World War II and some of the pictures featured on the front pages are staunch reminders of Japan after nuclear bombs were dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

Many pages are devoted to special reports on the tragedy, and possible effects the quake will have had on the country's economy and especially nuclear power plants, particularly that of Fukushima Daiichi, which was not far off the epicentre. The plant was seriously damaged during the series of natural disasters.
Conservative Le Figaro  says the traumatised archipelago fears further catastrophes and the occurrence of a "new Chernobyl" in reference to Ukraine’s 1986 nuclear disaster which is the worst recorded nuclear catastrophe. Le Figaro takes a look at the impact of past nuclear disasters such as Sellafield in the UK in 1957 and Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania in 1979. In comparison, last week’s nuclear incidents in Japan seem small. Indeed on the nuclear disaster scale Fukushima has reached 4. It's not great but it's still a far cry from Chernobyl's 7. Then again it may be too early to tell.

In any case, nuclear energy is up in the air once again. It had benefitted from better press in recent years because it did not emit CO2 thus taking part in the popular fight against carbon emissions.
Catholic La Croix notes that a number of French political parties re-opened the debate on whether nuclear is needed; the green parties, the socialists and even the centrist MoDem are apparently questioning the place of nuclear. French minister of Industry Eric Besson wanted to reassure people by saying that what happened in Japan "was serious but was not a catastrophe." That said, he is also known for backing that nuclear sector. La Croix also has an interview with Green politician Claudia Roth from Germany, who underlines the unpredictability of nuclear technology.

Leftist Libération looks at how "anti-atom" activists see Japan's reactor incidents as proof that nuclear power shouldn't be used. They’re urging countries to reconsider their positions when it comes to nuclear energy. Libération ponders on whether France is safe from such catastrophes. One thing the Japanese example has highlighted is that the improbable can always occur.

Le Figaro also has piece about how this will have a negative impact on world nuclear energy. This comes as 17 new countries are thinking of purchasing reactors. They include, Chili, Bangladesh and the UAE, which is currently building a reactor bought from South Korea.

Le Figaro asks: “Will Vietnam and Nigeria invest in the same way?” You have to bear in mind dear listener/reader that out of the four main countries who produce and sell nuclear products, France’s Areva is the most expensive but is it the safest?

The paper looks at France's EPR reactor, which's being built between China, Finland and France and wonders whether it would have better resisted such an earthquake. According to an interview in the paper with an expert this is the case. However is it really comparable? Fukushima's nuclear plant was built in the 1970s.
It is still too early to measure the extent of the damages; we’ll have to wait for the smoke to clear at Japan’s nuclear plants before we can really assess the impact Fukushima will have on nuclear energy. But as the expert also points out in the Le Figaro interview, it is also difficult to predict the damage it will have on public opinion.

EDITORIAL : THE DAILY DAILY NEWS EGYPT, EGYPT








Egypt's constitutional dilemma
By   Rania Al MalkyMarch 12, 2011, 1:15 am



In a week that began with the dramatic storming of State Security Investigations premises to stop the criminal burning and shredding of documents; was highlighted by violent, armed sectarian clashes which claimed lives and caused tens of injuries; then ended with an attack on Tahrir Square protesters that cleared the sit-in, the emphasis on restoring law and order has unfortunately drowned out the far more crucial issue of debating the proposed constitutional amendments ahead of the March 19 referendum.
To reiterate what I wrote in my editorial last week, and despite my unequivocal belief that it is every human being’s fundamental right to demand their social, political and economic rights, I was against the continued sit-in in Tahrir precisely because it was only a matter of time before the protesters would be attacked, not only by thugs affiliated with the former regime, but also by ordinary people whose livelihoods have come to a complete stop and misguidedly blame the protesters for their plight. The violent dispersal of the gathering in Tahrir and ensuing, indiscriminate arrests by the military police as well as the claims of torture in custody, has opened up another can of worms.
The protesters are not solely to blame for the chaos, but that said, their continued presence in Tahrir had compromised attempts by the new interim government to restore order. It has also empowered the remnants of the former regime in their undeniable efforts to wage a counter-revolution, infiltrating protests, stoking divisions among Egyptians and between the people and the army, spreading sectarian rumors and doing whatever it takes — with a little help from their friends in State Security — to bring down the new cabinet.
Unknowingly, the actions of those holding legitimate protests for legitimate causes have played into the hands of the criminals who will not let go without a fight, even if it costs us the constitutional future of Egypt.
Instead of being distracted by the sinister shadows of sectarian strife and gang street fights we must all focus on the biggest threat of all, that is the threat of a yes vote in the upcoming referendum on the proposed constitutional amendments.
First a disclaimer. I believe that it is of utmost importance to restore political normalcy within the next six to seven months both for economic and strategic, national security reasons. My reservations about the proposed amendments in no way suggest that I’m advocating the postponement of legislative or presidential elections to give new parties enough time to organize. This is unfortunately a luxury we cannot afford in this phase of Egypt’s democratic transition. What I am saying, however, is that much more can be done at this point to ensure that the proposed constitutional amendments do not contribute to a setback that would ultimately defeat the purpose behind making these amendments in the first place.
There is no denying that most of the amendments have met long-standing demands by Egypt’s opposition. Under the proposed changes the president would only be allowed to serve two four-year terms, instead of unlimited six-year periods; judicial oversight of elections has been reinstated; any future president will be obliged to appoint a deputy within 60 days of his appointment; candidacy criteria and conditions for presidential elections have been eased; and stringent rules have been put in place to make it difficult to maintain a state of emergency.
However, as it was pointed out by leading intellectuals and public figures like former IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, who gained a BA degree in law at Cairo University and a doctorate in international law at the New York University School of Law in 1974; Justice Tahani El Gebaly, Egypt’s first female judge and vice president of the Supreme Constitutional Court; as well as leading Egyptian political analysts like Amr Hamzawy, research director and senior associate at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut and Secretary General of the Arab League Amr Moussa, the proposed amendments are far from sufficient.
Pundits have criticized the fact that no changes have been made to limit presidential powers that are instated in over 30 articles in the constitution.
Amended Article 75 has been one of the most debated. The article was not among the protesters’ demands and introduces stringent rules regarding eligibility criteria for presidential candidates. According to the amendment a potential candidate cannot be a dual national — which is understandable — but would still not qualify even if he/she drops the second citizenship or is married to a non-Egyptian.
Apart from the fact that the change clearly discriminates against hundreds of thousands of Egyptians who are no less “Egyptian” than others who carry a single nationality, the amendment seems to aspire to some ideal of a “pure” race that does not exist.
The main criticism however, has been directed at Article 189. According to an analysis by the Carnegie Endowment, this article adds a provision for a new constitution to be requested by either the president (with cabinet approval) or at least half of the members of both houses of parliament. It calls for a constituent assembly of 100 members to be elected by a majority of the elected members from a joint session of the People’s Assembly and Shoura Council, which would draft a new constitution within six months and submit it to a popular referendum.
However, I agree with critics that it is not clear whether this assembly will be restricted to existing members of parliament or will allow for the appointment of individuals who are not MPs. Even though it is true that the addition to Article 189 renders the reactivated 1971 constitution provisional, it merely “allows” such a process of drafting a brand new constitution, rather than makes it obligatory within a specified timeframe.
The fear of future constitutional stalemates are not exaggerated but can be simply allayed through a few sovereign decisions by the ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces that will not hinder the fast track towards political stability. Suggestions include a revision of the constitutional amendments that would bear in mind the controversial changes and widening the scope of the amendments to include articles that give the president extraordinary powers.
Such moves do not require months and months to implement and if done with enough openness and acceptance of the need to accommodate the views of a wider segment of Egypt’s intelligentsia, as well as trusted and credible political and social actors, we could reach enough consensus to ensure that the path towards stability is not impeded.
In the final analysis only open democratic practices on all levels will steer Egypt in the right direction. Postponing vital steps towards the ultimate goal of building a democratic civil state based on the rule of law, respect for human rights and upheld by strong institutions will only prolong the chaos. We need to hold elections as soon as possible but must make sure that the resulting legislative assemblies and the emerging president are governed by a constitution that can neither be abused nor exploited for the benefit of a few at the expense of the greater good.
Rania Al Malky is the Chief Editor of Daily news Egypt.

EDITORIAL : THE PEOPLE'S DAILY, CHINA

People Daily hailing just-ended 4th session of 11th CPPCC National Committee

The 10-day annual meeting of the Fourth Session of the 11th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) completed all items on the agenda and came to a victorious close on Sunday, March 13. The People's Daily, the leading national newspaper in China, has published on Monday an editorial to mark the occasion and its excerpts read as follows:

Titled "Jointly Write a Splendid Chapter on Scientific Development", the editorial cites the just-concluded CPPCC annual meeting as a conference of vital importance, which has made new, eminent achievements. During the conference, Chinese President Hu Jintao and other Party and state leaders called on CPPCC National Committee members and respectively joined their panel discussions in mulling or deliberating national affairs together.

The editorial hails the attainments of the political advisory body in 2010, saying that the CPPCC National Committee and its members had made vital contributions when the country grappled with various challenges to boost sound and fast social and economic development. "We must be more willing or ready to uphold the leadership of the Communist Party of China (CPC), unswervingly keep to the political development path of socialism with Chinese characteristics, and continue to push forward the cause of the CPPCC," it said.

On Premier Wen Jiabao's Report on the Work of the Government", the CPPCC members referred to it as a report of confidence building, and of great inspiration and cohesion. The members are unanimous in the view that the 12th Five-Year Plan maps out the blueprint for the next five years (2011-2015), reflects China's ongoing reform and development trend, and is a solemn commitment the CPC Central Commitment and the Chinese government has made to the people of all ethnicities across China.

During the CPPCC annual session, more than 2,000 CPPCC members have carried out to the full their functions of political consultation, democratic supervision and participation in deliberation and administration of state affairs in the economic and social development. And this has displayed the vis and vigor of the CPPCC organization and its democratic functions.

With respect to the 12th Five-Year Plan period, CPPCC National Committee members have carried out assiduously and conscientiously the major policy decisions made by the Party Central Committee, adhere to the two themes of "national unity and democracy", and contributed positively in an effort to do good, happy things and coping with tough, difficult issues.

CPPCC National Committee members have, imbued with a high sense of responsibility, the Chinese nation and its people, been implementing its function of going on to perform the political consultation, democratic supervision and of deliberating state affairs; they have put forward proposals on optimizing the economic structure, taming inflation and other major issues in socio-economic development. This has displayed strong vitality of the CPPCC political organization and its democratic form with Chinese features.

Multi-party cooperation and political consultative system led by CPC, deep-rooted in the soil of survival and development of the Chinese nation and is developing or reinforcing the great practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics and, it has salient features and a unique Chinese style. Vivid practices over the past six decades or so have given an eloquent proof of its infinite vitality. We should adhere to CPC leadership, persevere in taking the political road of developing socialism with Chinese features and kept opening up the new situation in the cause of the CPPCC.

The 2011-2015 period is very crucial for China to further deepen the reform and opening up drive while accelerating the transformation of its economic growth pattern. To do a good job in every aspect in 2011 means a good beginning for the 12th Five-Year Plan period with a great and far-reaching significance.

Meanwhile, the National Committee of the CPPCC should, with an eye focusing on the work for the reunification of the motherland and national revival, ensure optimizing contacts and unity with Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan compatriots, working to deepen friendship with people of all other nations, keeping up friendship ties with people overseas, raising its capability and enhancing the self-development of the CPPCC.

Carrying the expectations of more than 1.3 billion people living in China, its "modernization" vessel is riding the winds and cleaving the waves. With an upbeat spirit and truth-seeking approach, the Chinese people, rallying round the CPC Central Committee with Hu Jintao as the General Secretary, have undertaken to write a new, splendid chapter, work hard to create a happy, contended life and strive for the splendid future for the Chinese nation's great rejuvenation.

EDITORIAL : THE NATIONAL POST, CANADA

Why Japan, 2011 wasn't Haiti, 2010

National Post · Mar. 14, 2011 | Last Updated: Mar. 14, 2011 4:03 AM ET
Just 14 months ago, several hundred thousand Haitians were killed in a massive earthquake perhaps as much as 3% of Haiti's population. Between 10% and 20% of the nation was rendered homeless. The earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan on Friday will produce a death toll that likely will be an order of magnitude lower. Thanks to the wealth, technological sophistication and foresight of post-war Japanese society, tens of thousands of lives have been saved.
Japan's emergency-response system kicked into action the second that shock waves originated off the coast of the Oshika peninsula on Friday: An earthquake early-warning system, connected to hundreds of seismometers around the country, broadcast bulletins on the country's television stations. In the minute or so it took the seismic waves to travel to the country's major population centres, millions of Japanese already were executing their well-rehearsed earthquakeresponse procedures.
The fact that the majority of buildings withstood the earthquake, even in the worst-affected areas, is tribute to the advanced building codes and materials the country has adopted. Unlike in Haiti (2010), Pakistan (2005) or Sichuan (2008), the casualty toll was not bolstered by acres of ramshackle tenements that collapsed immediately upon their occupants.
Even the country's nuclear installations may come out of the earthquake without generating any large-scale radiation calamity. An explosion at the Fukushima I facility blew away the installation's outer structure -yet the reactor itself, though having suffered a partial meltdown, apparently remains intact, for now. Thanks to safeguards and worldleading nuclear technicians and scientists, a Chernobyl scenario likely will be avoided.
Technology cannot save everyone: Thousands of Japanese citizens were swept away in the waves that hit shore in and around Sendai -a tragedy that no electronic network or construction technique can fully prevent. Yet the fact that Japan, 2011 is a far cry from Haiti, 2010 shows that the toll wrought by nature's most horrible tragedies can be massively reduced when societies amass the wealth and political will to prepare for the worst.
It is to the credit of Japan's leaders -and their predecessors -that this is exactly what they did in the years leading up to the 2011 Sendai earthquake.

EDITORIAL : THE AUSTRALIAN, AUSTRALIA

Japanese resilience helps mammoth rebuilding job

 THE toll from the quake and tsunami will be tragically high 
 NO nation can insulate itself from nature's fury, and certainly not from one of the biggest earthquakes in recorded history. But Japan was as close to being well prepared for such catastrophe as any nation could be in a region deeply vulnerable to seismological instability. As the toll from Friday's earthquake and tsunami is counted, the Japanese people have set about the recovery operation with a resilience, technical expertise and a capacity for organisation that have served them well for generations. Confronted with wastelands of debris, they are off to a good start with their recovery efforts, earning them the international community's respect as well as a willingness to assist. It says something important about human nature that one of impoverished Afghanistan's most violent provinces, Kandahar, is sending $50,000 in aid. Australia has sent search and rescue teams and stands ready to help in any way possible. And as the crisis at the Fukushima nuclear power plant 250km northeast of Tokyo unfolds, Japan and the rest of the world will learn important lessons about better protecting such installations from future catastrophes.
However sturdy Japan's contingency plans, it was impossible to prevent whole towns in the north being obliterated by the brunt of the quake and the tsunami, leaving 400,000 people displaced. With 10,000 people still accounted for in the small port town of Minamisanriku alone, it will take weeks or months to determine the final number of victims. Horrific as it is, the loss of life would have been far greater if not for sound warning systems and engineering. In Tokyo, with 13 million people, where modern buildings have been engineered to withstand earthquakes, skyscrapers swayed like palm trees but most, remarkably, sustained limited damage.
Three years ago, the Japanese completed the world's most sophisticated early-warning system for earthquakes, which was credited with giving industrial, energy and transport operators vital time to shut down on Friday. It also alerted residents through the media and mobile networks that a quake was imminent. Such resources need to be replicated in earthquake zones across the world, given the stark contrasts between Japan's proactive planning and the lack of preparedness in Haiti, where 200,000 people died as a result of the quake in January last year and Sichuan, China, where 70,000 perished in 2008. Search and rescue efforts remained the priority yesterday, but officials also concentrated on containing damage at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, evacuating surrounding areas and treating those admitted to hospital with suspected radiation poisoning. The problem arose from electricity blackouts causing the cooling systems of the plant's reactors to malfunction. Much needs to be learned about how to prevent such problems in the wake of future disasters. Other nations, prudently, are reviewing their facilities, but the fact that seawater was used to cool reactors suggests that technically it should not be beyond the capability of scientists to devise better safeguards.
Three years ago, the Japanese completed the world's most sophisticated early-warning system for earthquakes, which was credited with giving industrial, energy and transport operators vital time to shut down on Friday. It also alerted residents through the media and mobile networks that a quake was imminent. Such resources need to be replicated in earthquake zones across the world, given the stark contrasts between Japan's proactive planning and the lack of preparedness in Haiti, where 200,000 people died as a result of the quake in January last year and Sichuan, China, where 70,000 perished in 2008. Search and rescue efforts remained the priority yesterday, but officials also concentrated on containing damage at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, evacuating surrounding areas and treating those admitted to hospital with suspected radiation poisoning. The problem arose from electricity blackouts causing the cooling systems of the plant's reactors to malfunction. Much needs to be learned about how to prevent such problems in the wake of future disasters. Other nations, prudently, are reviewing their facilities, but the fact that seawater was used to cool reactors suggests that technically it should not be beyond the capability of scientists to devise better safeguards.
The gradual return to relative normality in parts of Japan after just three days is a reflection of the strength of character of the nation's people. Their characteristic good manners, civic mindedness and restraint remained largely intact on Friday under frightening circumstances, with few obvious signs of panic in circumstances that would jolt the nerves of any human being. Outsiders might find it extraordinary that Tokyo residents even waited patiently for the green light to cross roads that were empty of cars and tried to hold back goods on supermarket shelves as the earthquake struck, but it reflects a selfless and pragmatic society. Within hours of the quake, staff trapped in city offices were being handed bowls of noodles and water. The Japanese people's stoicism, gentle discipline, respect for authority and concern for their elders will be important as the rebuilding process picks up pace. The people will also need to be patient as the Japanese economy struggles with the fallout from the disaster, especially in the northern Tohoku region directly affected, which is an important manufacturing area producing about 8 per cent of GDP. Despite being the world's third-largest economy and a major industrial power, growth in Japan has averaged a flat 0.55 per cent for the past 30 years. In the short term, such stagnation will be reinforced by factory shutdowns, power cuts, transport disruptions and the impact on consumer confidence. Over time, reconstruction should restimulate the economy but will be a major challenge for the national government, which is mired in debt, with a credit rating downgraded in January to AA minus. Demand for Australian imports could be reduced in the short term but is likely to rebound during the recovery.
In an age when fatalism is in danger of becoming fashionable, the worst response to natural disaster is to succumb to the belief that our species is the plaything of malevolent forces beyond its control. The death toll in Japan is already tragically high, and likely to rise much further, and structural damage is appalling, but we take comfort that many more deaths were avoided because of prudent risk management, good governance and technology. While we bow in awe at the powerful natural forces that have forged our planet over billions of years, we also stand in respect for the resilience of the human spirit.

The gradual return to relative normality in parts of Japan after just three days is a reflection of the strength of character of the nation's people. Their characteristic good manners, civic mindedness and restraint remained largely intact on Friday under frightening circumstances, with few obvious signs of panic in circumstances that would jolt the nerves of any human being. Outsiders might find it extraordinary that Tokyo residents even waited patiently for the green light to cross roads that were empty of cars and tried to hold back goods on supermarket shelves as the earthquake struck, but it reflects a selfless and pragmatic society. Within hours of the quake, staff trapped in city offices were being handed bowls of noodles and water. The Japanese people's stoicism, gentle discipline, respect for authority and concern for their elders will be important as the rebuilding process picks up pace. The people will also need to be patient as the Japanese economy struggles with the fallout from the disaster, especially in the northern Tohoku region directly affected, which is an important manufacturing area producing about 8 per cent of GDP. Despite being the world's third-largest economy and a major industrial power, growth in Japan has averaged a flat 0.55 per cent for the past 30 years. In the short term, such stagnation will be reinforced by factory shutdowns, power cuts, transport disruptions and the impact on consumer confidence. Over time, reconstruction should restimulate the economy but will be a major challenge for the national government, which is mired in debt, with a credit rating downgraded in January to AA minus. Demand for Australian imports could be reduced in the short term but is likely to rebound during the recovery.
In an age when fatalism is in danger of becoming fashionable, the worst response to natural disaster is to succumb to the belief that our species is the plaything of malevolent forces beyond its control. The death toll in Japan is already tragically high, and likely to rise much further, and structural damage is appalling, but we take comfort that many more deaths were avoided because of prudent risk management, good governance and technology. While we bow in awe at the powerful natural forces that have forged our planet over billions of years, we also stand in respect for the resilience of the human spirit.

EDITORIAL : THE DAILY TELEGRAPH, U.K

An exception that proves the rule

The Sunday Telegraph's campaign against squatting can be relaxed when the victim is Saif Gaddafi. 

Last week, The Sunday Telegraph launched a campaign to give the owners of squatted houses greater legal powers to regain the quiet enjoyment of their property, rather than stand helplessly by and see it abused and degraded.
There is a legal principle that stands higher than the law, however, and that is justice. So, in the case of the £10 million mansion in Hampstead that belongs to Saif Gaddafi, the heir apparent to the appalling colonel’s tyranny, it seems to us that the protesters who have occupied it in the name of the Libyan people have that principle on their side. May they continue to enjoy its leafy retirement from the turbulent world, its eight bedrooms, swimming pool and sauna, until its wrongful owner has paid the price of his deeds.

A Budget that will bear fruit for businesses

Freeing small businesses from bureaucracy will be vital to a pro-growth Budget. 

David Cameron, the Prime Minister, has insisted that his Government will create “the most pro-enterprise, business-friendly environment that Britain has ever had”. Last week, he told his party’s spring conference that the imminent Budget will be “the most pro‑growth Budget this country has seen for a generation”. Similar promises were made by George Osborne, the Chancellor – but it was still unclear what the much-mooted “growth strategy” would actually do to cut red tape and tackle the hundreds of pages of regulation that strangle initiative and prevent businesses from expanding.
Today, this newspaper can provide part of the answer. As we reveal, the Budget is set to be built around that growth strategy – and at its heart are plans to exempt companies with 10 or fewer employees from compliance with the existing, inflexible laws on maternity leave. Instead, small businesses may be given the right to negotiate deals directly with their employees.
There is no doubt that it is very difficult for small companies to comply with the current maternity legislation. Indeed, the law’s rigidity has had the opposite effect to that intended: it has made small firms reluctant to take on young women, for fear that they will soon have to pay them without getting the benefit of their labour. So we applaud the new plans – while accepting that they will be highly controversial. The opposition is likely to come not just from Labour and the trade unions, but from the Tories’ Coalition partners: Nick Clegg has frequently said that he wants to compel firms to provide more paid leave for parents, not less. The European Commission and the Court of Human Rights could also weigh in, by finding that the changes to statutory maternity provision violate “the right to family life”. Then there are the details to consider: among other things, the system will need to include safeguards to prevent firms firing workers purely in order to qualify for the relaxed regime, or not hiring more to remain within its ambit. Yet while the difficulties are likely to be formidable, Mr Cameron and Mr Osborne are certainly right to make the attempt. Small businesses are the engine of the economy, and will be the source of the recovery. Unemployment will remain high for as long as they believe that the risks inherent in creating new jobs are too great to make it worthwhile.
Commendably, the Conservatives are applying this vision of an enterprise economy to Britain’s foreign relations, too. As William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, makes clear in an interview with this newspaper today, there will be a much greater emphasis on promoting British business abroad, and opening up new and emerging markets to British firms. Lord Mandelson, the former business secretary, pointed out in a speech this week that if Britain could increase its share of trade with the fast-growing Bric countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – to its global average, we would close an “export gap” worth £27 billion.
Not all of the ideas for the Budget will be equally welcome. The plan to make it easier for large companies to build shops and factories on the outskirts of towns sits oddly with the Tories’ campaign against a near-identical proposal by the Labour government. Giving the supermarkets free rein in the name of promoting growth could arouse significant opposition. Still, the signs are encouraging for a Budget that will give British business the help that it needs and deserves.

Dr Claire Chung has a right to be angry

The case of a courageous rape victim raises troubling questions. 

Dr Claire Chung is a very remarkable woman. Although she insists she is not “brave”, she has demonstrated extraordinary courage twice over: first in going to the police immediately after she was viciously raped by Stephen Gale, which ensured that he was caught. And second, in meeting her assailant after he had been convicted, and confronting him with the consequences of his crime.
Dr Chung is also angry – not so much with Gale, as with the prison authorities. Gale had a string of convictions for sexual offences, including indecent assault and burglary with intent to rape, when given an 18-month sentence for indecent exposure. Before his release, he had several interviews with psychologists, from whom he successfully concealed, as so many in his position do, that he still harboured the urge to commit violent sexual offences. He completed two rehabilitation courses: within a day of being released, he had committed his terrible crime against Dr Chung.
The prison system’s main aim is meant to be “protecting the public”. Yet all too often, the system fails. We hope that those in the Ministry of Justice who insist that the public can be protected adequately by sending offenders on courses like Gale’s think again: many hundreds of innocent people suffer horrible crimes as a consequence of the mistaken belief that such rehabilitation has rendered criminals “safe”. Then there is the Coalition’s wider desire to clear jail cells of all but the longest-serving prisoners. In 2007, Gale was given an indefinite sentence for raping Dr Chung, but he will be up for release in 2012: his minimum tariff was just five years. Will he be released next year? Given the Government’s new approach to criminal justice, we fear the answer is yes.

 

 

 

CRICKET24

RSS Feed