JUI-F chief targeted
 THE assassination attempts on  Maulana Fazlur Rahman, on two successive days, should not come as a  surprise: he is not the first `moderate` religious leader whom  extremists have tried to eliminate. He is lucky to have survived; others  were not. On June 12, 2009, Mufti Dr Sarfaraz Ahmad Naeemi, imam of  Jamia Naeemia and a respected scholar, fell victim to a suicide attack.  He was a vocal opponent of religious extremism and of the theory and  practice of Taliban philosophy. His assassination in a Lahore mosque and  the recent attempts on the life of the JUI-F chief conform to  doctrinaire strategies which all ideologically motivated movements  follow. A `soft-liner` in the fraternity — whatever the term might mean  at a given time — is a greater enemy and threat than the `real` enemy.  Whether it was the FLN in Algeria or the liberation movement in Kashmir,  those who assumed the role of mainstream fighters have always  considered `deviants` from the `right path` as heretics meant to be done  away with. 
The Taliban have no shame in declaring that  they are at war with the state of Pakistan. For that reason they target  all state institutions and those who run them. They have denounced the  electoral process and allege that democracy is western in nature.  Maulana Fazl and his party do not appear to share this philosophy and,  believing in parliamentary democracy, take part in elections, thus  incurring the TTP`s and Al Qaeda`s wrath. The JUI-F has been a fierce  opponent of Islamabad`s perceived pro-America policies, but that did not  stop it from contesting the 2002 and 2008 elections. The JUI-F has also  been part of coalition governments in Islamabad and two provinces and  has  exhibited common sense by believing that democracy is the best way  of solving political differences and resolving ideological schisms.  This, in the eyes of the extremists, is  a crime punishable by death.
After  the first deadly attack, which killed several party workers, the JUI  chief managed to reach the venue of his Swabi meeting, where in an angry  speech he denounced America and the war on terror. Speaking to the  media after Thursday`s  attack, the maulana spoke in the same vein,  saying that he had been targeted because of his opposition to the drone  attacks and his support for Dr Aafia Siddiqui — there was obvious  reluctance to openly condemn religious extremism although he is aware  that such violent tactics are linked mostly to the TTP. We urge the  government to hold an inquiry to determine who planned to assassinate  Maulana Fazl, a veteran politician of  national stature.
After the setback
IT should have been a great show but it wasn’t, primarily  because we faltered when it mattered most. No team should expect to win a  vital game if it drops a player like Tendulkar no less than four times  and then, chasing a reasonable target, goes about its batting with  remarkable ordinariness. Seasoned players who should know better on any  given day, let alone a milestone occasion, played with a run-chase  strategy that defied logic. The batting left a lot to be desired but in  the final analysis it was our woeful fielding that cost us the game.  Pakistan lost by 29 runs. How many of those runs could have been saved  if the fielders had done the job expected of extravagantly paid  professionals? They failed, miserably, and the batsmen weren’t far  behind in an all-round show of incompetence. South Africa have for long  been branded as chokers, a team that stutters when the pressure is on.  Well, on Wednesday in Mohali, it was Pakistan that choked in a fashion  that devastated the nation.
That said, it ought to be  kept in mind that this was always going to be a contest. One team was  going to win and in this instance it was Pakistan that lost. What the  nation, and by extrapolation the country’s cricketing structure, has  gone through in recent years would have stymied many a team right at the  outset. Yet Pakistan fought it out and deserves to be commended for  making it to the semi-finals of one-day cricket’s showcase event. As  early as Thursday morning there were murmurings about corruption and an  effort to deliberately throw the game. People who subscribe to  conspiracy theories right off the bat — and there has been plenty of  reason for that going back to the mid-1990s — should watch more cricket  with a level head. The team isn’t always looking to do Pakistanis down,  especially this one under Shahid Khan Afridi. The side couldn’t perform  and that should be pretty much it if one isn’t a magnet for  rumour-mongering. Let’s give the Pakistan team a rousing reception when  it comes home.
Doctors on strike
THE loss of several precious lives in Lahore in a single day  allegedly because of a protest strike by doctors brings the latter into  disrepute. The young doctors working at public hospitals had been  agitating for better job packages for some time. They reportedly took  their extremely painful campaign to another level on Wednesday by  refusing to see even ‘critical patients’ — if this distinction can be  made in the case of the desperate souls who turn up at any health  facility, let alone a government-run one. It is appalling to listen to  accounts in which the trained hands are blamed for not performing their  duty of saving a fellow human being’s life. This paper listed seven  deaths resulting from the callous attitude of the doctors on Wednesday.  Later investigations revealed many more such cases, completing a truly  tragic picture.
The strikers should have done everything  to avoid this, both as healers beholden to their oath and as  professionals who must shun negative publicity as they fight for their  rights. In fact, the disrepute the protesting doctors have so earned  weakens their case. However, the government cannot be totally absolved  of its responsibility in creating this ugly situation in public  hospitals. Ultimately, the doctors’ struggle
highlights the system’s skewed priorities. Both the health sector and those who work for it are desperately short of resources and in need of quick remedies. After a long standoff, on Wednesday an adviser to the chief minister assured the protesting doctors that their service packages would be reviewed when experts prepare the next budget. For this promise to come true, he asked the doctors to return to work which is what they did on Thursday evening. If only the two sides had realised this a few days and a few deaths earlier.
highlights the system’s skewed priorities. Both the health sector and those who work for it are desperately short of resources and in need of quick remedies. After a long standoff, on Wednesday an adviser to the chief minister assured the protesting doctors that their service packages would be reviewed when experts prepare the next budget. For this promise to come true, he asked the doctors to return to work which is what they did on Thursday evening. If only the two sides had realised this a few days and a few deaths earlier.


0 comments:
Post a Comment