UN resolution legality needs a gatekeeper
On March 29, Gaddafi's army recaptured two cities. This new twist to  the Libyan military situation has heaped political embarrassment on the  West. It is now time to prevent the West from further abusing Security  Council Resolution No. 1973.
The Western powers have acted beyond  the resolution. Although the leaders of the US, Britain and France have  said their military actions are only aimed at establishing a no-fly  zone, the Western air strikes have directly attacked Libyan government  forces and provided air support for the opposition. They have jointly  demanded Gaddafi to step down immediately, which has nothing to do with  Security Council resolutions.
In the absence of China, Russia, the  African Union and most members of the Arab League, the London  conference centered around the political landscape of the "post-Gaddafi  era." This countermands the authority of the United Nations and goes  against the Western declaration of "letting Libyan people determine by  themselves."
The intensification of Western direct military  intervention could force Gaddafi to step down soon. But the West has two  obstacles: the Security Council resolution does not grant them such  authority and they have to consider public opinion. The greater the  opposition of global opinion, the more hesitant the West will be.
China  should unite with Russia in requiring the US, Britain and France to  respect Security Council resolutions. As the Security Council president  this month, China should hold an emergency meeting at the ambassadorial  level, and demand announcements about air strikes and plans for future  intervention. The Council should ask the West to guarantee no expansion  of military operations.
China should let French President Sarkozy  know that the air strikes he defends are widely opposed in China. If he  is a president with political honor, he should face the questions posed  by Chinese media and guarantee that he will abide by Resolution 1973.
The  world must not allow the West to act unchecked, especially when using  the name of the UN. They should hear the voices of opposition and face  the problems they cause.
Maintenance of the Security Council  resolution can achieve a moral high ground. China and Russia abstained,  which does not mean the US, Britain and France gained carte blanche.  China, Russia, Brazil and other emerging countries should take actions  to let these three countries understand this.
China should enter  into contact with the Libyan opposition and various other forces in the  Middle East. Libya's future can only be decided by the Libyan people  themselves. Since Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy also agree with this, they  should accept supervision. Even if the supervision would encounter some  opposition in the Arab world, it is still worth doing.


0 comments:
Post a Comment