Problems of abundance
Even as a season of bountiful harvest of the rabi season crops, wheat  followed by rice, gets under way, India's food management policy has  come under a great deal of stress. The main objectives of food  management are unexceptionable: procurement of food grains from farmers  at remunerative prices; distributing them to consumers, particularly  deprived and vulnerable sections of the people at affordable prices, and  maintaining buffers for food security and price stability. It is the  instruments used — the minimum support price (MSP) and the central issue  price (CIP), and the nodal agency, the Food Corporation of India (FCI) —  that have come under scrutiny at a time India is facing problems of  plenty. An immediate problem has been one of storage. As of March 1, the  FCI was reportedly holding 45.8 million tonnes of rice and wheat — more  than twice the prescribed buffer stock norm, which includes a food  security reserve of five million tonnes. A sizable part of this is  stored in the open, with minimal protection. The FCI has also used  private warehouses for stocking grain for which it incurs a heavy  carrying cost. The problem of storage will become acute if, as expected,  the FCI procures another 15-20 million tonnes of wheat during this  season. 
 There are no easy ways out. Export of grains to reduce the surplus may  not be an optimal solution. Like many countries, India has been very  selective in permitting exports of food grains. The interests of  domestic consumers have been paramount. There have been occasions when  Indian exporters were priced out. Sales in the domestic markets to  reduce the stocks are possible but even here a coherent strategy is  needed. In many places, open market prices of wheat are reportedly  ruling below the MSP. Solutions to the storage crisis will have to be  found in a larger context of reordering the food management and  procurement policies. The old fixes will not work at this juncture.  Procurement of wheat and rice is open ended and the MSP, which has been  raised by successive governments, sets the floor price, thereby  contributing to higher prices. There is, at this point, very little  chance of restricting each year's procurement to actual production. Nor  can the mechanism of MSP be revisited in its entirety, given the  political sensitivity involved. According to the Economic Survey  2010-11, the economic cost of food grains to the FCI has increased  substantially over the last few years but the issue price has not gone  up, so the food subsidy bill will go up. The continuing tragedy is that  the Indian system is not able to deliver the ‘surplus' food grain to the  hungry. 

0 comments:
Post a Comment