Caretaker government reform
Three month tenure non-negotiable
The  controversy over the Awami League-proposed reform of the caretaker  government centres not on three month duration of the CG's mandate but  on the ruling party's suggestion that the failure to hold elections  within three months would render a revival of the immediate past elected  government. 
Let's put the whole issue in perspective to arrive at a judicious conclusion. 
BNP-led  four party alliance raised the retirement age of judges only to have  the incumbent chief justice head the caretaker government. Naturally,  the opposition Awami League then had reasons to resent it. In these  circumstances, President Iazuddin Ahmed ignored the other options to  choose a chief adviser and himself appeared in the dual role of the  president as well as the chief adviser.
The situation was further  compounded by a flawed electoral roll with more than one crore  non-existent voters in it, so that there was legitimate demand for an  authentic electoral roll. Meanwhile, President Iazuddin declared  emergency and ushered in a military-backed caretaker government. This  interim government had before it the task of making a computerised  authentic voter list with photographs.
Since all these  circumstances are neither present nor likely to emerge in the future,  the overriding provision of three month tenure of the CG can be put  firmly and squarely in place. We already have an authentic voter list,  all that it requires is updating before the next general election, which  also happens to be a continuing process. 
Hence, the AL's  suggestion that the outgoing elected government would take over if the  CG cannot hold elections within ninety days, does not stand to reason.  It is basically contradictory to AL's original position on the caretaker  government. Its demand for a non-partisan CG was based on complete  no-confidence in an elected party government to hold general elections.  How can it now reverse its stand?
So we take the view that 90-day  tenure for CG should be non-negotiable. In these stipulated three months  the CG should not only hold elections but also effect transfer of power  to an elected government. All these should be stipulated in legally  tight formulation.
Symbolism of May Day
Let quality of life improve for citizens
The  memory of the 1886 Chicago Haymarket bombing and shootings lingers. And  because it does, there is the symbolism set off by the assault on the  working classes that we observe today along with the rest of the world.  In Bangladesh especially, May Day has for decades been a potent hint of  how much yet remains to be done in the matter of ensuring the rights of  not just industrial workers but also of the struggling masses of the  country as a whole. The message on the day is, therefore, loud and  clear: the collective happiness of a society is in the end dependent on  how society treats its most important means of production, namely, its  workers and its peasantry.
It cannot be denied that over the years  economic policies have taken a distinctive turn away from the command  or mixed economy and towards a free market direction in Bangladesh. The  growth of industry, the development of export goods in varied ways, the  institution of the micro-credit system have all yielded results which  have added substance to the nation's economy. And yet one must raise the  question of whether such progress has satisfactorily been reflected in  the lives of the working classes. There are still the safeguards, in  terms of a healthy workplace environment and job security, that must be  in place in ready made garments and in other sectors of the economy.  Images of the young toiling away for a pittance at unhealthy factories  are yet part of the social scene in this country. The very fact that  tens of thousands of our citizens are compelled by economic reasons to  seek low-paying, menial jobs in other countries is a broad hint of where  we might have stumbled in promoting a society of equality.
May  Day has always been a time for a voicing of legitimate demands. Today,  let the demand be for a guarantee of all those measures that will  improve the quality of life, for workers and peasants, for all citizens  of Bangladesh. 


0 comments:
Post a Comment